Clio Talks Back
Archive
- juin 2011
- mai 2011
- avril 2011
- mars 2011
- février 2011
- janvier 2011
- décembre 2010
- novembre 2010
- octobre 2010
- septembre 2010
- mai 2010
- avril 2010
- mars 2010
- février 2010
- janvier 2010
- novembre 2009
- octobre 2009
- août 2009
- juillet 2009
- juin 2009
- mai 2009
- avril 2009
- mars 2009
- février 2009
- janvier 2009
- décembre 2008
- novembre 2008
- octobre 2008
- septembre 2008
- août 2008
- juillet 2008
- juin 2008
- mai 2008
- avril 2008
I.M.O.W.'s debut blog, Clio Talks Back, will change the way you think about women throughout history! Be informed and transformed by Clio Talks Back, written by the museum's resident historian Karen Offen.
Inspired by Clio, the Greek muse of History, and the museum's global online exhibitions Economica and Women, Power and Politics, Karen takes readers on a journey through time and place where women have shaped and changed our world. You will build your repertoire of rare trivia and conversation starters and occasionally hear from guest bloggers including everyone from leading historians in the field to the historical women themselves.
Read the entries, post a comment, and be inspired to create your own legacies to transform our world.
What is women’s work?
12/11/2009 | (0) | Ajouter Votre Commentaire
What is “women’s work”? Is it primarily mothering and housework, as some would still have us think?
Let’s look at the impact of industrialization. How many of you out there are aware that the work of women is central to what we understand as the “industrial revolution”? How many people know that as textile production (spinning and weaving) was first mechanized in early 19th century Europe, that women were eagerly sought after as employees in textile mills and became the most visible, and the most criticized of industrial employees (because their labor was cheap and their presence in the workforce highly visible).
How many of you appreciate that the beginnings of the industrial production of foodstuffs, of industrial canning, for example, dramatically changed what women had to do in households. How many people realize that this process is still going on – as, for example, in rural Mexico and other parts of the countryside in Latin America, where the traditional grinding of corn by hand on the metate is being superceded by the advent of the electrical grinder or mill? How many other forms of “women’s work” around the world – hauling water, hauling wood or brush for fires, etc., tending poultry, growing fruits and vegetables – are being altered irrevocably by electric power and mechanical devices, not to mention running water? What forms of work replace these customary, age-old women’s chores?
What difference did it make in these chores if a woman were born poor or rich? What if a woman was a servant – or a slave? Or a queen? What if she had children? Or, what if she had none? What have women gained from this process of economic transformation? What have women lost?
Women have always “worked”; the question is what value has been placed on their contributions, and who decides what that value is. And how does it change over time?
Clio
