Seeds of Resistance

Saving Seeds is a Political Act!

"Seeds are our mother," declares physicist and activist Vandana Shiva, founder of the revolutionary Indian seed-saving organization Navdanya. The organization's name translates as "nine crops." Its mission: To support local farmers and rescue and conserve crops that are being pushed into extinction. "Seed is the first link in the food chain," explains Shiva. "Saving seed is our duty, sharing seed is our culture."
AP Photo / Rajesh Kumar Singh
Women sow paddy in a field at Pawara, some 40 miles south of Allahabad, India. View Larger >
Farmers everywhere have been saving seeds for centuries, preserving the most durable ones for replanting. Women farmers in India were no different; that is, until 1995. That year India signed an international trade agreement giving multinational corporations permission to patent, own and sell seeds. As a result, seeds are becoming the private property of a handful of corporations, transforming the tradition of saving seeds into a subversive political act.

Women Say "Enough!"

Led by Vandana Shiva, and inspired by Mahatma Gandhi‘s concept of non-violence, the women of Navdanya refuse to obey international trade laws or heed the rules of market economy. How did the poorest and most underprivileged group in India--women farmers--become activists? And how did something as tiny as a seed stir such controversy?

With the new laws in effect, multinational corporations, in particular Monsanto, patent seeds and sell them at high prices to small farmers. For these farmers, cost of production soars and profit margins decrease, often leading to hunger and bankruptcy.

Recently the Indian government reported that more than 25,000 farmers have committed suicide since 1997, two years after the patent laws had come into effect. However, their report named alcoholism and not indebtedness as the cause of the suicides. Shiva and women of Navdanya strongly disagree.

Shiva believes that Indian farmers are finding themselves on the brink of a "crisis of extinction" because the patent laws discriminate against them and benefit corporations. The paradox, she says, lies in the fact that women farmers, today's consumers of patented seeds, are the ones responsible for developing them in the first place.

"Women have been seed experts, the seed breeders, seed selectors, the biodiversity conservers of the world. And if today we have seeds that we can save, if today we have communities that can tell us the unique properties of different crops and different seeds, it's because we've had generations of women not recognized as agronomists, not recognized as breeders, not recognized in any way as having knowledge. The 10,000 years of human expertise in feeding us is a women's expertise."

According to Shiva, corporations steal from farmers: "Most patents today are based on straightforward biopiracy, the theft of women's innovation of centuries." Farmers lose control over their means of subsistence because they're now dependent on the patented, genetically modified (GMO) seed: "A system where few companies control the seed supply is in effect a system of slavery for farmers. Where the freedom of seed disappears, the freedom of farmers disappears," says Shiva.

Revolution in the Rice Fields

Women of Navdanya are waging a multifaceted revolution. They are taking a stand for the environment by mobilizing farmers across India to refuse buying GMO seeds that are damaging Indian biodiversity. They are campaigning against the use of pesticides and herbicides. They are educating farmers on the benefits of native seeds. Finally, they have established 34 community seed banks across the country that preserve native Indian seeds and distribute them at no cost to all interested farmers.

They have also started an economic revolution. They have mobilized some 10,000 farmers to disobey international trade agreements India has signed and create their own independent markets. Small farmers organized by Navdanya have shut corporations out of their fields, are using their own native seeds, and growing food for subsistence instead of monocultures for sale.

Finally, Navdanya's ecological and economic revolution is political in nature. The women have organized some 35,000 Indian villages into declaring themselves "biodiversity republics." These republics are organized around the principle of "living democracy," meaning democracy that is participatory and values sharing, community and the environment. Whereas Indian economy is governed by free trade, these republics are pockets of fair trade and economic independence.

Shiva has been accused of being naïve and quixotic. Some argue that it is not possible to sidestep the market system and the World Trade Organization (WTO). They say traditional systems of farming and trade belong to the past and are not plausible in today's globalized world. Primarily, the dissenters argue that ancient systems of farming cannot successfully feed today's one billion starving people.

Shiva, however, refuses to budge. She points out that the reason so many people are going hungry is unjust trade relations and not organic farming based on diversity. She calls for a complete revision of the WTO agreements so that the interests of farmers are taken into consideration. Finally, she calls for a return to an economic and political system grounded on sharing and not on profits and private property, one based on women's knowledge, women's traditions and women's legacy:

"The women of India have evolved two hundred thousand rice varieties, work done over millennia by hundreds of thousands of unknown grandmothers. At no point did any one of those women turn around and tell her sister, 'Now I have bred this new rice. Now onwards, it is my property; now onwards you will pay me royalties.'"

Citations taken from Vandana Shiva's lecture at the University of California at Santa Barbara entitled "Planting the Seed for Change: Women's struggle against Corporate Control of Biodiversity" (August 1, 2004) as well as articles published on Navdanya's official Web site.


Deleted User

I have to admit, the only time I ever think about seeds is when I eat watermelon. I hate swallowing those seeds, although they're smooth and cold. Since I was a child, I always thought that out of a single, tasty seed, a watermelon tree (yes, I imagined that watermelons grew on trees) would sprout in my stomach and then proceed to grow out of my ears, eyes and nose. I did have a wild imagination, fired up by my younger cousin, who is today both a spectacular cartoonist and a terrifying psychoanalyst.

What I am trying to say in this painfully digressive and round-about way, is that I was ignorant of the power and plight of seed until I learned of Navdanya and Vandana Shiva. That I, a city girl who has however spent many-a-summer vacation running around the rocky Dalmatian countryside, tending to goats, picking grapes, and digging potatoes with my invincible grandmother, rarely ever stop and consider the plight of farmers who are feeding us. Because, food does come from somewhere other than the supermarket.

I want to eat the native Croatian tomatoes whose incredible sour-sweet flavor I had taken for granted as a child. I can't find those tomatoes any longer. They all taste like red-colored water these days. I don't want my food to taste like different-colored water. I want it to have nutritional value, I want it to taste good and I want it to remind me of the past, of my heritage, of my grandma. Because there is respect and future in heritage, traditions and native food.

If you liked this story, check out the video submitted by Global Oneness Project on seed saving in India.

Michael DeLong
Michael DeLong
United States

Another terrible aspect of this was that Delta and Pine Land, a company owned by Monsanto, also developed a "terminator" seed - one that dies after a single generation - and was going to dump it into the market in India. Their claim was that the technology of the seed prevented the rampat spread of GMO seeds, but many suspect the real intention was to keep farmers dependent upon corporate seeds, forcing them to buy new ones every year. Regardless of the intent, just the idea of designing a seed that essentially commits suicide (much like the farmers themselves were to do later), is mind-boggling. A mind that could conceive of such a thing is so utterly dark, squelching the entire regernerative process of nature for stratetic reasons. Besides, if GMO seeds did not exist in the first place, we would not need a "terminator" seed to control them.

Ironically, the only way that Monsanto agreed to keep the terminator seed off the market was if India would pass other legislation to open up the market to free trade and corporate interference. Essentially, the protection from the terminator seed was tacked on as a "gimme" in exchange for other important rights.

Log In

RSS Story Feed

Take Action

Send an SOS!

Send an SOS!

Sign the Save Our Seed (SOS) Petition and keep native and organically-grown seeds free of genetically modified organisms! --English, French, Spanish