Fashion Is Political

Fashion Editor Robin Givhan Talks Politics

Robin Givhan, the Pulitzer prize-winning fashion editor for the Washington Post, writes about the fashion industry and the ways in which it influences the lives of ordinary people who seldom find themselves walking along a red carpet. She refuses to accept the notion that fashion is somehow for "other" people. Instead, her goal is to show her readers that we all participate in "fashion" every time we dress ourselves. Fashion, in her opinion, is the most personal form of communication we have. It expresses who we are, and, more important, it expresses how we wish to be perceived.
Creative Commons
Robin Givhan has called the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi "chic," a term rarely used in Washington to describe a politician. Speaker Pelosi has become famous for her colorful Armani suits. View Larger >
Yulia Tymoshenko's Web site
Yulia Tymoshenko, the Prime Minister of Ukraine, is known worldwide for her golden crown of braids. Her peasant look has been celebrated on the cover of Elle Ukraine, as well as imitated by the British pop-star Kylie Minogue. View Larger >
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
On her visit to Wiesbaden Army Airfield on February 24, 2005, Condoleezza Rice wore a long, fitted black coat and a pair of sleek, high-heeled boots. Has a U.S. politician ever looked this sexy? View Larger >
When most people think about fashion, they think about red carpets. But your columns shed new light on fashion. Can you give us some examples of fashion influencing politics?

Take, for example, protesters during the Civil Rights era. They marched into an onslaught of vicious dogs and fire hoses dressed like they were going to church. They looked so dignified. And I believe that their appearance underscored their message of humanity and justice.

Consider the way in which politicians -- at least the male ones -- are forever taking off their suit jackets and rolling up their sleeves whenever they find themselves addressing blue-collar workers. The gesture is somehow meant to signify sincerity and straight-talk. Also, what are all of those flag pins on lapels but a fashion statement about patriotism? Some might see it as sincere; others might interpret it as hogwash. But there's no denying that fashion -- in this case a brooch -- is used as a political statement.

What can you tell about the political views of Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice from the way they dress?

I don't know if particular styles indicate liberalism or conservatism. I don't think those on the left dress profoundly different from those on the right. Sure, there's the stereotype of left-leaning women as being crunchy-granola, Birkenstock-wearers, and those on the right dressing in prim yellow suits and pearls. Some of that exists, but most women fall in the muddled middle. I think what's most striking about Clinton and Rice is that both of them are in history-making positions of power as women and, for Rice, as an African-American. With each barrier that's broken, I think we come to a new understanding of what power can look like and sound like.

I've talked about Rice's appearance at Wiesbaden Army Airfield wearing a long black coat and knee-high black boots. The ensemble had a sexiness to it that we hadn't seen before in any of our leaders of that rank. I think we are still uncomfortable with women of authority who refuse to hide their sexuality behind a boxy suit and sensible heels.

For example, I was surprised by the amount of outrage that followed a column I wrote about Clinton showing cleavage on the Senate floor. I made it clear that it wasn't an unseemly amount, but just enough to be noticed. I thought it was a sign of confidence -- a merging of gender and power. Some people reacted as if I'd given her a catcall. As a culture, we still aren't comfortable noticing and acknowledging femininity in the halls of power. Women don't have to dress in navy suits and blouses with floppy bows. But we still have a long way to go.

How intertwined, then, are politics and fashion, appearance and authority?

I think the combination of politics and fashion is a natural one. Politicians are more concerned about the messages they convey, the way in which they're coming across to their constituency and the way in which they're perceived, than any other group of people I can think of, except perhaps, for entertainers.

Fashion has been used in politics as a way of showing solidarity and respect. When a politician graciously accepts a sweatshirt emblazoned with a school logo or pops on a cap with a union logo, it's a way of announcing: I am one of you. When heads of state visit foreign countries and dress in that country's traditional garb, it's a way of showing respect and mutual understanding. Our clothes identify us as members of a particular tribe in the same way our accent or our slang does. We tend to trust people who talk like us. We also tend to feel more at ease with those who dress like us.

Can you give us some contemporary examples of female politicians' fashion choices, and what those choices say about them?

I loved that Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, on her 2006 visit to the United States, wore a traditional African attire with pearls. For me, she combined cultural authenticity and pride with a very Western flourish. It was a way of having one foot firmly in the needs and traditions of Liberia, along with recognition that sometimes reassurance for outsiders lies in the details.

Can you think of a female politician whose fashion style misfired and, proverbially, brought her down?

I don't think fashion has the power to bring down a female politician, unless she was wearing something profoundly outrageous or culturally offensive. Fashion is more like a detail or a flourish that can enhance or distract. The person who comes immediately to mind is Katherine Harris, who was the Secretary of State in Florida during the 2000 presidential election recount. Her excessive makeup distracted from her work. And in my mind, it even made one wonder about her broader ability to use restraint and moderation in the handling of the recount. When she later ran for Congress, she reduced the amount of makeup she was wearing -- and won. I tend to think most female politicians only rise to power because they have -- for the most part -- found a way to navigate the style issue.

Has the appearance -- hair, fashion, grooming, weight, clothes, accessories -- of a politician become the new best way to understand her true intentions?

I would never say that appearance telegraphs intentions. Fashion is a far too unreliable language. A short skirt can have a multitude of meanings depending on who's doing the looking. But that's also what makes it so fascinating. Fashion can make what a person is saying more or less believable.

Politicians have worked hard to master the art of dressing for their audiences. They no longer feel comfortable dressing in a way that outshines or intimidates the audience. No one wants to be caught wearing a $5,000 suit. We've become a country that likes to think of our politicians as "just like us." Politicians work hard to blend in and appear approachable and real. The trick is not to let anyone see how hard you're working to appear so natural. Remember poor Al Gore when he was a presidential candidate? The media found out that he'd been advised to wear earth tones and I think some pundits are laughing to this day. When people discover a politician is being "dressed", in their eyes that politician has been reduced to an infant.

Is appearance more important to women in power or men in power?

Women have a disadvantage in politics because they don't have a uniform to hide behind. They don't have the dark business suit, white shirt and red tie. But that also allows women to stand out. They have more leeway, more options for dressing casually, for instance. Men often look incredibly uncomfortable as soon as they're not wearing a suit.

I do think there are different standards. I don't necessarily think that it's unfair. Men and women are different and they bring different characteristics to their work. That's why we need both genders with equal places at the table.

What is the ideal "look" for a female politician?

I think essentially we want our female leaders to look noticeably attractive without drawing attention to themselves with their attire. That's a tricky balance. I think Hillary Clinton does it quite often. But I don't think you can say that a bright geranium-colored blazer is subtle. We don't want our female politicians to look masculine; we also don't want them looking too "girly."

Name one female politician, in the United States and abroad, whose appearance and political message are in sync.

I think Nancy Pelosi looks especially chic, smart and authoritative. I also thought Benazir Bhutto balanced contemporary sophistication with traditional modesty and seriousness.

Finally, hair and accessories: What kind of hair should female politicians have to be considered electable?

Yulia Tymoshenko, for example: I think her braids are, uh, a reflection of her intimate knowledge of what appeals to her constituency. I don't think they play on a world stage, however. I tend to believe that white female politicians in the United States are selecting their hairstyles based on what they believe to be age-appropriate rather than politically savvy. In this country, there is a belief that women of a certain age should not wear their hair long -- that it's too juvenile. In the United States, we do tend to equate long locks with youth and sexiness. Those are not necessarily two notions a woman wants to conjure up when she's, say, running for Senate.

I also think black women have more complicated hair issues. Some black female politicians at the Congressional and state level wear their hair in braids, for instance. And I think that style speaks to their constituency in a very intimate way. But, would we elect a candidate with dreadlocks to the presidency in the near future? I don't think so. The style is associated too much with rebellion and subversiveness. Voters tend to want a candidate whose appearance reassures them, not one whose style agitates them.


Deleted User

Robin Givan is an incredible journalist. It's no wonder that she has been awarded a Pulitzer Prize for Criticism! I really respect her insight, sass and ruthless, poetic sincerity. Just read her sentences: Every one feels like a pearl an oyster has been working, polishing, smoothing and rounding for years.

Listen and watch her multimedia analysis of the U.S. presidential candidates called The Front-Runners. It is hillarious and incredibly astute.

Karen Offen
Karen Offen
United States

But what about the way fashion issues might play out for women in Latin American politics? Does the new president of Argentina, for example, have the same issues about appropriate dress as women politicians in the United States?

Veronica Castellanos
United States

This is comment is in regards to politics and fashion. This is a topic that I have never put much thought to but in reading have been able to pin point instances in the pass where presidents have incorporated fashion as a tool to get across their political beliefs. For instance, in passing the a particular trend of wearing an american flag pin after the disaster of 9/11 appeared on the suits of various politicians at a heightened rate than in the pass when we weren't in such a tragic crisis. I agree that the flag pin was a tool that was utilized to get the message across in a very subtle way. I also agree with the fact that appearance is a motivating way to draw in a politician's constituents in and creat a personal and confortable ambiance between politician and constituent.

Brenna Murphy
United States

It says "I think we are still uncomfortable w/women of authority who refuse to hide their sexuality behind a boxy suit and sensible heels." In other words, it's not okay yet for women to dress like women. So, if politicians dress to relate to their audience, who are female spectators supposed to relate to if female politicians still wear masculine attire?

donya disperati
United States

this comment is for the fashion is political article. I think it is interesting how women's fashion is even percived as too feminie at times and how as a culture we are not ready for women in power to show their feminity.

Deleted User

Politics and fashion: I think fashion in politics is very important. The country is not ready for a woman in power to show her sexuality. People seem to prefer that a woman dress more masculine than really show that she is woman.

Aisha Canfield
United States

Politics and fashion: Fashion seems to be as strategic as politics and politicians. What's appropriate or not seems to be defined by culture, age, gender, race and power. Women politicians are expected to look attractive, but not too sexy. Unfortunately this often results in women having to masculanize themselves in boxy suits and subtle colors to be taken seriously. However, Hillary and Pelosi have began wearing brighter colors and clothes that fit to a woman's body. Small steps to Equality!

United States

interesting how womens fashion is even percieved as too feminine at times and how as a culture we are not ready for women in power to show their feminity.

Kirsten Lee
Kirsten Lee
United Kingdom

I really liked Robin's reference to fashion during the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. I recently went to an exhibit on women during the Holocaust. An installment in the exhibition talked about how Jewish women in the concentration camps would secretly put on makeup and tailor their uniforms to be more feminine. While these women were being treated as less than human, fashion became their subversive act of political defiance. To me, this is incredibly moving.

In the past I did notice that women in power tend to tone down their appearance to appear more responsible and able to make decisions. In Nigeria, where our full traditional attire is rather flamboyant our female politicians are regarded as humble, sincere and responsible when their jewellery or attire is light. Fashion does make a difference in the way people perceive an individual and women tend to have a more difficult time of it. Great article Robin.

Brooke Cosgrove
United States

In response to, "I thought it was a sign of confidence -- a merging of gender and power. Some people reacted as if I'd given her a catcall. As a culture, we still aren't comfortable noticing and acknowledging femininity in the halls of power." :
I think it is important to remember that femininity and being sexualized for male consumption are too very different things. A merging of gender and power should not mean offering oneself up as a sexual object. Does confidence come from successfully living up to a patriarchal view of what is "sexy"? Painful heels and clothes appealing to men do very little to advance women's power but only serves to confuse a generation of women sexualized at a very young age. Women will only be truly confident when we stop monitoring and judging ourselves based on appearance rather than accomplishment. I guess sensible heels and a boxy suit have no place in connection to femininity? I disagree. Nothing is more feminine than practicality as we have been forced to achieve through practice and action throughout history. Down with the male gaze! The next time someone asks you what you thought about what Condi, Hillary, or any other woman in power was wearing, tell you refuse to answer on grounds the stupidity of the question is far too astounding for your brain to process.

Brooke Cosgrove
United States

sorry, two very different things, not too very different things, but you get the drift.


Nous attachons à nouveau, de manière très générale, une grande importance à notre façon de nous exprimer, également à travers nos vêtements. Par ailleurs, nous prêtons davantage attention à l’apparence des autres.

Log In

RSS Story Feed

Take Action

Learn About Women, Media <br>and Politics

Learn About Women, Media
and Politics

"From Hillary to Bella: Women, Politics and the Media" is a not-to-be-missed event taking place in New York City --English.